Customs and Patent Appeals· 5/5/1977
In re Nolan
Citations
- 553 F.2d 1261
- 193 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 641
- 1977 CCPA LEXIS 153
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- improvement in gaseous discharge device and process unpatentable because although unexpected results were shown in some features, the results were not unexpected in the most significant feature
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baldwin, Claims, Kashiwa, Markey, Miller, Rich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re MayCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1978-04-20· cited 43×
- In re GreenfieldCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1978-03-16· cited 17×
- In Re Eli Lilly & CompanyFederal Circuit· 1990-04-30· cited 14×
- GRACEWAY PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC v. Perrigo Co.D. New Jersey· 2010-06-10· cited 5×
- In re MagerleinCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1979-07-05· cited 4×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Application of Richard E. Warner and Virginia Ann WarnerCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1967-06-29· cited 31×
- Application of Rene De Montmollin and Henri RiatCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1965-05-13· cited 25×
- In re MurchCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1972-08-24· cited 23×
- In re SkollCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1975-10-23· cited 20×
- In re SimonCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1972-06-08· cited 14×
- In re FreemanCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1973-03-08· cited 13×
- In re BodeCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1977-02-24· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.