In re N.L.
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 166
Syllabus
Where trial counsel did not object to the introduction of testimony by the guardian ad litem and the appellant essentially adopted that testimony, there was no plausible basis for excluding the GAL's testimony. On the evidence presented, the trial court's conclusions in weighing the factors set forth in R.C. 2151.414 were not against the manifest weight of the evidence.
Judges: Brunner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
- State v. Morgan (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2017-09-13· cited 111×
- Hayward v. Summa Health System/Akron City HospitalOhio Supreme Court· 2014-05-08· cited 86×
- Cahill v. OwensOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-07-14· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.