Skip to main content

In re N.L.

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 166

Syllabus

Where trial counsel did not object to the introduction of testimony by the guardian ad litem and the appellant essentially adopted that testimony, there was no plausible basis for excluding the GAL's testimony. On the evidence presented, the trial court's conclusions in weighing the factors set forth in R.C. 2151.414 were not against the manifest weight of the evidence.

Judges: Brunner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.