Skip to main content
· 5/25/1977

In Re Nissan Motor Corporation Antitrust Litigation

Citations

  • 552 F.2d 1088
  • 23 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 521
  • 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 13244

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that without this information, \an absentee class member lacks an essential fact or in the decisionmaking equation\
  • finding that “[n]o peculiar circumstances exist which would warrant a departure from [the] general rule” that “class representatives must be prepared to accept the concomitant responsibility of identifying absentee class members as well as paying the costs of their individual notice”
  • weighing a search’s potential advantage in determining the class’s scope against the burden to the producing parties
  • “[i]f the initial class notice does not include information on the proposed settlement, however, an absentee class member lacks an essential factor in the decisionmaking equation”
  • “Rule 23(d) vests the district court, as manager of the class action, with the appropriate authority to enter whatever orders are necessary to the conduct of the action[.]”
  • to comport with due process, “it is not only necessary that the notice reach the parties affected but that it convey the required information”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.