In Re NHC-Nashville Fire Litigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “Ballard dealt exclusively with discovery filed with the court and did not address protective orders on unfiled discovery”
• recognizing that “Ballard dealt exclusively with discovery filed with the court and did not address protective orders on unfiled discovery”
• holding that under the abuse of discretion standard, a ruling will be upheld so long as reasonable minds could disagree as to its propriety
• explaining that the permissive intervenor had “a presumptive right of access to documents filed in court”
• observing that “the courts shall be open” under Article I, Section 17 of the Tennessee Constitution
• explaining that the permissive intervenor had “a presumptive right of access to documents filed in court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).