Skip to main content
· 11/14/2008

In Re NEXT Financial Group, Inc.

Citations

  • 271 S.W.3d 263
  • 52 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 112
  • 28 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 830
  • 2008 Tex. LEXIS 994
  • 2008 WL 4891735

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that securities brokerage firm could compel arbitration based on arbitration agreement in application for securities industry registration signed by plaintiff employee because the brokerage firm was \a clearly intended third-party beneficiary\
  • \[A] tort claim arising from a securities broker's illegal conduct 'arose out of' the brokerage firm's business and was subject to arbitration based on the arbitration provision in the U-4.\
  • “[A] tort claim arising from a securities broker’s illegal conduct ‘arose out of’ the brokerage firm’s business and was subject to arbitration based on the arbitration provision in the U-4.”
  • intended third-party beneficiary may compel arbitration in accordance with terms of agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.