Skip to main content
· 7/1/1879

In re New York Kerosene Oil Co.

Citations

  • 18 F. Cas. 154

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding as a matter of contract law that where an employment agreement did not specify a term of employment, the agreement ―was terminable at will by either party‖
  • allowing appeal to proceed, even though the notification improperly referred to the order appealed from, because the notification sufficiently identified the final judgment at issue and because the appellee was not prejudiced by the failure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.