In re New Energy Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• judges must “implement the Bankruptcy Code as written, rather than make changes that they see as improvements”
• a transaction which increases the price realized by the estate would help creditor recovery and “would [be] a reason to confirm the sale rather than set it aside”
• “Yet bankruptcy courts are entitled to require cash bids, rather than complex and hard-to-value bids including leases and options. Cash bids are comparable; the sort of bid Natural Chem wanted to make could not easily have been compared against others.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Equipment Acquisition Resource
  Seventh Circuit· 2014-02-04· cited 27×
• In re Brown
  N.D. Indiana· 2016-08-02· cited 7×
• In re Caesars Entertainment Operating Co.
  N.D. Illinois· 2015-03-09· cited 3×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 2,155×
• Radlax Gateway Hotel, LLC v. Amalgamated Bank
  Supreme Court· 2012-05-29· cited 542×
• Rothery Storage & Van Co. v. Atlas Van Lines, Inc.
  D.C. Circuit· 1986-06-03· cited 137×
• Polk Bros., Inc. v. Forest City Enterprises, Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 1985-11-26· cited 104×