Skip to main content
· 7/27/2011

In Re Neurontin Marketing and Sales Practices

Citations

  • 799 F. Supp. 2d 110

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the scholarly article regarding efficacy of pharmaceutical manufacturers’ prescription anticonvulsant drug for off-label uses was not likely to change result of trial
  • holding a new meta-analysis of existing scientific studies was not new evidence because the defendant “could have performed a similar meta-analysis prior to the trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Saris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.