Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
N.D. Ohio· 6/2/1989

In Re Nelson

Citations

  • 100 B.R. 905
  • 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 888
  • 1989 WL 63431

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he court will not grant a motion to reopen when no clear benefit is shown to creditors.... Because no benefit will inure to Debtors’ estate or their creditors, Debtors’ motion should be denied.”
  • “Although no time limit is specified by the Bankruptcy Code during which a motion to reopen must be filed, such a motion must be brought within a reasonable time; laches may justify denial of such a motion.”
  • “Although no time limit is specified by the Bankruptcy Code during which a motion to reopen must be filed, such a motion must be brought within a reasonable time; laches may justify denial of such a motion.”
  • “Although no time limit is specified by the Bankruptcy Code during which a motion to reopen must be filed, such a motion must be brought within a reasonable time; laches may justify denial of such a motion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walter J. Krasniewski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.