In Re: National Presto Industries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “unless the balance is strongly in favor of the defendant, the plaintiff’s choice of forum should rarely be disturbed” but “[r]arely . . . is not never” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• noting that “unless the balance is strongly in favor of the defendant, the plaintiff’s choice of forum should rarely be disturbed” but “[r]arely . . . is not never” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted)
• noting that “unless the balance is strongly in favor of the defendant, the plaintiff’s choice of forum should rarely be disturbed” but “[r]arely . . . is not never” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted)
• noting that “unless the balance is strongly in favor of the defendant, the plaintiff’s choice of forum should rarely be disturbed,” but acknowledging that “[r]arely . . . is not never” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted)
• noting that “unless the balance is strongly in favor of the defendant, the plaintiff’s choice of forum should rarely be disturbed,” but acknowledging that “[r]arely . . . is not never” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted)
• discussing the \subpoena range\ of federal district courts in transfer analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).