Skip to main content
· 1/3/2005

In Re Nathaniel A.

Citations

  • 864 A.2d 1066
  • 160 Md. App. 581
  • 2005 Md. App. LEXIS 3

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial court properly took judicial notice of pleadings in prior CINA determination where the pleadings were entered into evidence at the later proceeding
  • finding a child was a CIÑA, and therefore neglected, based solely on the substantial risk of harm if the child remained in custody of her mother and was not placed into foster care

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Panel: Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.