In Re Napier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that lack of prejudice is not grounds to extend the time period for filing a proof of claim under Rule 3002(c)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Wharry
  N.D. Ohio· 1988-08-31· cited 8×
• Cathcart v. General Holding, Inc. (In re Derivium Capital, LLC)
  D. South Carolina· 2007-03-16· cited 4×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Street v. Lawson (In Re Street)
  Ninth Circuit· 1985-11-25· cited 62×
• In Re Goodwin
  D. Maine· 1986-02-20· cited 27×
• In Re Ungar
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1987-02-27· cited 26×
• In Re Key
  M.D. Tennessee· 1986-09-11· cited 17×
• In Re Schneider
  D. Colorado· 1984-11-02· cited 11×
• In Re Furrer
  E.D. Wisconsin· 1986-11-06· cited 8×