In re Nachwalter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a federal court sitting in diversity must apply the choice-of-law rules of the state in which it sits
• citing, inter alia, Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Elec. Mfg. Co., 313 U.S. 487, 496 (1941)
• applying California’s equitable estoppel law where California statute of limitations was borrowed
• “Proposed amendments are futile if they would fail to cure deficiencies or state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6).” (internal quotation omitted)
• amendment futile if it would fail to cure prior deficiencies or fail to state a claim
• “Where the injury is purely economic, the place of injury usually is where the plaintiff resides and sustains the economic impact of the loss.” (quotations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).