In re N. Children
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 1492
Syllabus
JUVENILE – PERMANENT CUSTODY – EVIDENCE – SUFFICIENCY – MANIFEST WEIGHT – BEST INTEREST – R.C. 2151.413: The juvenile court properly granted permanent custody to the agency when clear and convincing evidence supported its finding that a grant of permanent custody to the Hamilton County Department of Job and Family Services was in the best interest of the children.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting defendant’s argument under Rule 412(b)(1)(A
- rejecting -8- defendant’s argument under Rule 412(b)(1)(A
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bergeron
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.