In re M.W.
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 3889
Syllabus
Abuse of discretion permanent custody best interests of child determination CCDCFS R.C. 2151.353(A)(4) R.C. 2151.414 clear and convincing evidence guardian ad litem Sup.R. 48.03. Judgment affirmed. There is clear and convincing evidence in the record to support the court's determination that permanent custody to CCDCFS is in the children's best interests. Accordingly, the court's decision to grant permanent custody is not against the evidence. Furthermore, the court did not abuse its discretion in determining that permanent custody of the children be awarded to CCDCFS. The record also demonstrates that while the GAL did not visit the maternal grandfather's home, the GAL still fulfilled her duties to the children.
Judges: Boyle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. SchiebelOhio Supreme Court· 1990-10-26· cited 1,644×
- Davis v. FlickingerOhio Supreme Court· 1997-02-12· cited 1,567×
- In re SchaeferOhio Supreme Court· 2006-10-25· cited 400×
- In Re A.J.Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-12-20· cited 35×
- Nolan v. NolanOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-08-14· cited 28×
- In re C.O.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-11-27· cited 22×
- In re C.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2011-10-27· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.