In re Murray
Citations
- 19 N.M. 53
- 140 P. 1042
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. In the absence of an assignment of errors, where the •same is required by statute or rule of court, no relief is asked of the appellate court, and it will not enter upon a consideration of the case. And, where the appellant or plaintiff in error has failed to file an assignment of errors, as required by Section 21, Chapter 57, S. L. 1907, and no attempt is made to excuse the default, the appeal or writ of error will be dismissed. P. 55</p>
Judges: Roberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ditch v. SennottIllinois Supreme Court· 1886-01-25· cited 39×
- Davis v. LangIllinois Supreme Court· 1894-10-30· cited 24×
- Williston v. FisherIllinois Supreme Court· 1862-04-15· cited 13×
- Jesse French Piano & Organ Co. v. MeehanAppellate Court of Illinois· 1898-08-31· cited 11×
- Benneson v. SavageIllinois Supreme Court· 1886-01-22· cited 7×
- Burrall v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Illinois Supreme Court· 1905-10-24· cited 2×
- State v. EchertIndiana Supreme Court· 1871-05-15· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.