In re Murray

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying the applicant’s requested relief—admission to the bar despite failing the exam—but stating that retaking the exam “might or might not have been available to him upon demonstration of ‘good cause’ under the [Board’s rules].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Applicant No. 5 to the 1994 Delaware Bar & Professional Conduct Examinations
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1995-05-15· cited 4×
• In re Cahill
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1996-06-10· cited 2×
• In Re Petition of Marla Matrice Murphy
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2022-08-17

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Green
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1983-07-26· cited 61×
• Petition of Rubenstein
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1994-02-28· cited 17×
• Petition of Nenno
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1983-11-18· cited 17×
• In Re Fischer
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1981-01-23· cited 10×
• In Re Reardon
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1977-08-11· cited 10×
• In re Golby
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1977-06-16· cited 9×
• In Re Hudson
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1979-05-01· cited 8×