Illinois Supreme Court· 1/23/1884
In re Murphy
Citations
- 109 Ill. 31
Syllabus
<p>Insolvent debtor—discharge from imprisonment—where malice is the gist of the action. Malice being the gist of an action of trespass for an assault ancl battery, the defendant in a judgment rendered against him in such an action, held in custody under a capias ad satisfaciendum, is not entitled to a discharge from imprisonment under the provisions of the “Insolvent Debtors’ ” act.</p>
Judges: Craig
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Peters v. United States ex rel. KelleySeventh Circuit· 1910-01-28· cited 36×
- People ex rel. Mark v. WalkerIllinois Supreme Court· 1919-02-20· cited 19×
- Lipman v. GoebelIllinois Supreme Court· 1934-06-15· cited 10×
- Mahler v. SinsheimerAppellate Court of Illinois· 1886-12-08· cited 7×
- Masterson v. FurmanAppellate Court of Illinois· 1900-05-10· cited 7×
- Fetz v. PeopleAppellate Court of Illinois· 1926-01-20· cited 6×
- Stoike v. BonaseraAppellate Court of Illinois· 1927-02-07· cited 6×
- Blattau v. EvansAppellate Court of Illinois· 1895-01-10· cited 5×
- Scanlon v. WhalenAppellate Court of Illinois· 1928-05-14· cited 5×
- Radtke v. PeopleAppellate Court of Illinois· 1912-06-17· cited 4×
- Kitterman v. PeopleAppellate Court of Illinois· 1913-06-30· cited 4×
- Abbrassart v. BouchardAppellate Court of Illinois· 1926-07-17· cited 3×
- Roughan v. RoughanAppellate Court of Illinois· 1912-12-03· cited 1×
- Amborn v. SmyserAppellate Court of Illinois· 1913-10-13· cited 1×
- In re BobzinAppellate Court of Illinois· 1921-02-19· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.