Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
· 3/20/1905

In re Mundle

Citations

  • 139 F. 691
  • 1905 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • excluding an expert’s testimony for, in part, uncritically accepting projections provided by the appointing party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.