In re M.P.
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 5223
Syllabus
Juvenile court; child support; amount; potential income; voluntarily underemployed; imputed income; criteria; statutory requirements; reasons; sound reasoning; Juv.R. 40(D); R.C. Ch. 3119; R.C. 3119.05(A); R.C. 3119.01(C)(18)(a); objections; magistrate's decision; hearing. Reversed the decision of the juvenile court and remanded the matter for a hearing on the issue of child support. The juvenile court did not evaluate the relevant statutory criteria under R.C. 3119.01(C)(18), and there was not sufficient information in the record from which to ascertain whether the juvenile court's decision for imputing potential income to the child's father was the product of a sound reasoning process. A juvenile court is permitted to conduct a hearing when ruling on objections to a magistrate's decision.
Judges: S. Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Rock v. CabralOhio Supreme Court· 1993-08-11· cited 520×
- Marker v. GrimmOhio Supreme Court· 1992-11-25· cited 401×
- Mayer v. MayerOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-02-24· cited 5×
- Page v. PageOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-02-11· cited 4×
- In re S.M.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-11-13· cited 3×
- Desensi v. EppleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-07-11· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.