In Re Moreno

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• prospective operation of sentencing statutes serves legitimate purpose of maintaining deterrent effect of laws by carrying out the original prescribed punishment
• prospective application of amendment reducing penalty for an offense does not violate equal protection
• the Legislature properly may give only prospective operation to statutes that lessen the punishment for a particular offense, to assure that penal laws will maintain their desired deterrent effect by carrying out the original prescribed punishment
• the Legislature properly may give only prospective operation to statutes that lessen the punishment for a particular offense, to assure that penal laws will maintain their desired deterrent effect by carrying out the original prescribed punishment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Way v. Superior Court of San Diego Cty.
  California Court of Appeal· 1977-10-19· cited 59×
• Beckley v. Aaron N.
  California Court of Appeal· 1977-06-22· cited 36×
• In Re Stinnette
  California Court of Appeal· 1979-06-06· cited 32×
• State v. McCarthy
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-06-03· cited 17×
• People v. Brown
  California Court of Appeal· 2010-03-16· cited 14×
• State v. McCarthy
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-06-19· cited 11×
• People v. Community Release Board
  California Court of Appeal· 1979-09-07· cited 10×
• Zimmerman v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2001-06-29· cited 8×
• Ex Parte Zimmerman
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2002-06-14· cited 6×
• In re Secada
  California Court of Appeal· 1978-04-19· cited 1×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Estrada
  California Supreme Court· 1965-12-23· cited 2,432×
• People v. Aranda
  California Supreme Court· 1965-11-12· cited 665×
• McGinnis v. Royster
  Supreme Court· 1973-02-21· cited 618×
• People v. Francis
  California Supreme Court· 1969-05-06· cited 322×
• In Re Kapperman
  California Supreme Court· 1974-05-23· cited 192×
• In Re Fink
  California Supreme Court· 1967-11-14· cited 22×
• Irvin Russell Jones v. H. C. Cupp, Warden, Oregon State Penitentiary
  Ninth Circuit· 1971-12-29· cited 19×
• People v. Mason
  California Court of Appeal· 1958-09-18· cited 12×
• Hosier v. Aderhold
  Fifth Circuit· 1934-06-05· cited 10×
• People v. Avelino
  California Court of Appeal· 1947-10-17· cited 7×
• Bennett v. Procunier
  California Court of Appeal· 1968-06-07· cited 5×