In re Moran Transp. Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “a mere reference to medical records,” without more, violates Rule 26(a)(2)(C) (citation omitted)
• concluding plaintiff’s expert disclosures did not comply with Rule 26 and limiting the expert’s opinion testimony as a sanction
• finding that Rule 26(a)(2)(C) requires more than stating witness’s connection to case or reference to medical records, absent summary of witness’s expected testimony
• noting “[T]he Eighth Circuit has instructed trial courts to consider, inter alia, the following four factors: ‘[(1)] the reason for noncompliance; [(2)] the surprise and prejudice to the opposing party; [(3
• “A summary is defined as a brief account that states the main points of a larger body of information.”
• “[T]he Court grants leniency to pro se litigants and may excuse failures to comply with local rules . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).