In Re Montgomery

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The existence of a claim is usually determined by non-bankruptcy substantive law, whereas valuation of that claim is determined by § 506.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Duke
  W.D. Kentucky· 2006-07-12· cited 29×
• In Re Trejos
  D. Nevada· 2006-09-25· cited 28×
• DaimlerChrysler Services North America LLC v. Taranto (In Re Taranto)
  Sixth Circuit· 2007-03-30· cited 24×
• In Re Bray
  W.D. Tennessee· 2007-04-11· cited 14×
• In Re Bethoney
  D. Massachusetts· 2008-01-17· cited 9×
• In re Shelton
  N.D. Illinois· 2018-09-14· cited 8×
• In Re Ross
  W.D. Tennessee· 2006-06-23· cited 5×
• In Re Castleberry
  M.D. Georgia· 2010-09-29· cited 5×
• In re: Mark Taranto v.
  Sixth Circuit· 2007-03-30

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• In Re Montoya
  D. Utah· 2006-04-10· cited 41×