In re M.J.M.
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 4799
Syllabus
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Father's motion to terminate or modify his child support obligation where Father failed to establish that his monthly child support obligation was unjust or inappropriate and not in his child's best interest. The fact that the child receives monthly Social Security benefits as a result of the death of the child's mother, and that the child will receive guardianship funds when she turns 18 years old, did not justify terminating or reducing Father's child support obligation. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Welbaum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 1,562×
- Williams v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court· 2000-05-17· cited 36×
- Paton v. PatonOhio Supreme Court· 2001-03-07· cited 21×
- Burks v. BurksOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-10-18· cited 6×
- In re M.M.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-05-25· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.