In Re Mizel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reciprocal ninety-day suspension and two years of probation imposed for failure to provide competent representation, failure to act diligently, failure to communicate with client, conflict of interest, failure to terminate representation when disabled, and misrepresentation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Banks
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1998-05-07· cited 5×
• In re Collins
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1999-02-11· cited 2×
• In re Pinckney
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-09-28· cited 2×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Kersey
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-01-28· cited 118×
• In Re Slosberg
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-12-29· cited 98×
• Matter of Goldberg
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-03-30· cited 88×
• In Re Peek
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-11-03· cited 41×
• In Re Lyles
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-07-18· cited 29×
• In Re Chisholm
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-07-03· cited 26×
• In Re Larsen
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-04-12· cited 22×
• Matter of Mulkeen
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-05-22· cited 19×