In Re Mirant Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Upon consideration of the law and the parties’ arguments . . . Compass is entitled to the emails in question based on Reed Smith’s joint representation of the parties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wooley v. Lucksinger
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 2011-04-01· cited 352×
• In Re Teleglobe Communications Corp.
  Third Circuit· 2007-07-17· cited 285×
• In Re Mirant Corp.
  N.D. Texas· 2006-11-21· cited 25×
• West v. Hsu (In Re Advanced Modular Power Systems, Inc.)
  S.D. Texas· 2009-09-16· cited 24×
• In re Fundamental Long Term Care, Inc.
  M.D. Florida· 2013-03-19· cited 17×
• Williams v. McGreevey (In Re Touch America Holdings, Inc.)
  D. Delaware· 2009-02-03· cited 14×
• Collins v. Kohlberg & Co. (In Re Southwest Supermarkets, LLC)
  D. Arizona· 2007-09-25· cited 9×
• In Re Crescent Resources, LLC
  W.D. Texas· 2011-07-22· cited 9×
• Raytheon Company v. Boccard USA Corporation
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2012-05-10· cited 6×
• In Re Bounds
  W.D. Texas· 2010-08-31· cited 5×
• In Re Ginn-LA St. Lucie Ltd., LLLP
  S.D. Florida· 2010-11-09· cited 5×
• Ries v. Ardinger (In re Adkins Supply, Inc.)
  N.D. Texas· 2016-07-26· cited 5×
• In Re Mirant Corp.
  N.D. Texas· 2008-05-15
• In Re:Teleglobe Comm
  Third Circuit· 2007-07-17

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Upjohn Co. v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1981-01-13· cited 3,227×
• United States v. Bestfoods
  Supreme Court· 1998-06-08· cited 1,059×
• Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Weintraub
  Supreme Court· 1985-04-29· cited 753×
• Clark v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1933-03-13· cited 738×
• Swidler & Berlin v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1998-06-25· cited 387×
• Garner v. First American Life Insurance
  Supreme Court· 1971-03-22· cited 255×
• Tekni-Plex, Inc. v. Meyner & Landis
  New York Court of Appeals· 1996-10-22· cited 189×
• Brennan's, Inc. v. Brennan's Restaurants, Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 1979-02-26· cited 159×
• Production Resources Group, L.L.C. v. NCT Group, Inc.
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2004-11-17· cited 157×
• EF Hutton & Company v. Brown
  S.D. Texas· 1969-09-18· cited 140×
• Anadarko Petroleum Corp. v. Panhandle Eastern Corp.
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1988-06-23· cited 102×
• United States v. Robinson
  Fifth Circuit· 1997-08-29· cited 85×
• Ohio-Sealy Mattress Manufacturing Co. v. Kaplan
  N.D. Illinois· 1980-09-17· cited 69×
• Valente v. Pepsico, Inc.
  D. Delaware· 1975-08-25· cited 63×
• Beneficial Franchise Co. v. Bank One, N.A.
  N.D. Illinois· 2001-05-08· cited 36×
• Resolution Trust Corp. v. H-, P.C.
  N.D. Texas· 1989-10-26· cited 31×
• Seltzer v. I.C. Optics, Ltd.
  D. New Jersey· 2004-07-11· cited 29×
• Scroggins v. Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy (In Re Kaleidoscope, Inc.)
  N.D. Georgia· 1982-12-03· cited 27×
• Glidden Co. v. Jandernoa
  W.D. Michigan· 1997-06-05· cited 27×
• Scroggins v. Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy (In Re Kaleidoscope, Inc.)
  N.D. Georgia· 1981-11-13· cited 20×