In Re Milot

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that proceeding under 32 V.S.A. § 4467 requires trial court “to try the dispute anew”
• rejecting taxpayers’ argument “that a trial court in a de novo proceeding under 32 V.S.A. § 4467 is bound in some way by the evidence presented in the prior proceedings or by which party had taken the appeal”
• where taxpayer fails to present sufficient evidence of fair market value of comparable properties, “city-wide ratio . . . should be applied as if the property were unique”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).