Hawaii Supreme Court· 4/5/1916

In re Mills

Citations

23 Haw. 224
1916 Haw. LEXIS 23

Syllabus

<p>AttorNey and Client — disbarment—reinstatement.</p> <p>On an application for reinstatement' by a disbarred attorney it must be made to appear that the applicant has accepted and ■fully acquiesced in the judgment of disbarment, and where, by the applicant’s own showing, it appears that he has not fully acquiesced in such judgment, his petition for reinstatement will be denied.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“[Claims] that were assigned ... [through an agreement] he would undertake collection of same and if successful pay to the assignor a stated sum ... constituted- an evasion of the judgment of disbarment....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Quarles, Robertson, Watson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.