Customs and Patent Appeals· 2/11/1947
In re Miller
Citations
- 34 C.C.P.A. 910
- 72 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 512
- 159 F.2d 756
- 1947 CCPA LEXIS 466
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting argument that the need for eight references for rejection supported patentability
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bland, Connell, Garrett, Hatfield, Jackson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re Jeffrey B. Gorman and Marilyn KatzFederal Circuit· 1991-05-13· cited 37×
- Application of DemarcheCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1955-02-21· cited 9×
- Application of HallCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1953-11-24· cited 8×
- In re WilliamsCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1955-06-15· cited 5×
- In re DeJarlaisCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1956-05-15· cited 4×
- Matter of the Application of Gordon M. De JarlaisCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1956-05-15· cited 3×
- Application of Birdsall P. Lawson, Deceased (Pilling Chain Co., Assignee)Customs and Patent Appeals· 1955-12-08· cited 1×
- Application of Norman P. WilliamsCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1955-06-15
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.