In re Miller
Citations
- 129 Wash. 538
- 225 P. 429
- 1924 Wash. LEXIS 780
Syllabus
<p>Criminal Law (426) — Appeal—Review—Waiver of Error. An objection that a conviction was by a jury that was improper because not empanelled within the time required by law is waived by not raising it on appeal.</p> <p>Jury (56) — Competency-—Husband and Wife. Error cannot be assigned on the fact that the jury contained a husband and wife.</p> <p>Habeas Corpus (3) — Nature op Restraint. Release on habeas corpus cannot be sought by a prisoner claiming the illegality of cumulative sentences, where he has not yet served the sentence which he admits was legally imposed.</p> <p>Same (11) — Jurisdiction—Appellate Courts — Discretion. The supreme court will not grant a writ of habeas corpus except in cases involving interest of the state at large or of public interest, or where there is no other remedy; this being within the discretion of the court, in view of the concurrent jurisdiction of the superior courts.</p> <p>Same (8-1) — Grounds for Relief — Correction of Error — Criminal Sentence. Habeas corpus does not lie to review or correct error.</p>
Judges: Main
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Holt v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court· 1974-12-26· cited 31×
- In re VoightWashington Supreme Court· 1924-06-04· cited 17×
- Phillips v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals· 1960-08-16· cited 14×
- In re MillerWashington Supreme Court· 1924-12-16
- González de Jesús v. DelgadoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1964-02-10
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In re NewcombWashington Supreme Court· 1909-12-18· cited 35×
- Ex parte WinstonNevada Supreme Court· 1873-10-15· cited 28×
- State ex rel. Tingstad v. StarwichWashington Supreme Court· 1922-04-13· cited 24×
- State v. GillulyWashington Supreme Court· 1908-07-07· cited 20×
- State v. MillerWashington Supreme Court· 1914-02-21· cited 17×
- State v. AndrewsWashington Supreme Court· 1912-11-25· cited 14×
- State ex rel. Ottesen v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court· 1923-04-20· cited 12×
- In re NolanWashington Supreme Court· 1899-07-20· cited 11×
- In re BlystoneWashington Supreme Court· 1913-09-06· cited 11×
- In re EmchWashington Supreme Court· 1923-04-21· cited 9×
- State ex rel. Anderson v. CallahanWashington Supreme Court· 1922-04-12· cited 7×
- In re PutnamWashington Supreme Court· 1910-06-10· cited 4×
- Ex parte WilliamsWashington Territory· 1867-12-15· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.