Skip to main content

In re Miller

Citations

  • 129 Wash. 538
  • 225 P. 429
  • 1924 Wash. LEXIS 780

Syllabus

<p>Criminal Law (426) — Appeal—Review—Waiver of Error. An objection that a conviction was by a jury that was improper because not empanelled within the time required by law is waived by not raising it on appeal.</p> <p>Jury (56) — Competency-—Husband and Wife. Error cannot be assigned on the fact that the jury contained a husband and wife.</p> <p>Habeas Corpus (3) — Nature op Restraint. Release on habeas corpus cannot be sought by a prisoner claiming the illegality of cumulative sentences, where he has not yet served the sentence which he admits was legally imposed.</p> <p>Same (11) — Jurisdiction—Appellate Courts — Discretion. The supreme court will not grant a writ of habeas corpus except in cases involving interest of the state at large or of public interest, or where there is no other remedy; this being within the discretion of the court, in view of the concurrent jurisdiction of the superior courts.</p> <p>Same (8-1) — Grounds for Relief — Correction of Error — Criminal Sentence. Habeas corpus does not lie to review or correct error.</p>

Judges: Main

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.