In Re Miller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because the trustee had adduced no evidence contradicting the debtor’s characterization of a settlement as compensation for the loss of future earnings, the debtor’s position must be accepted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lester v. Storey (In Re Lester)
  S.D. Ohio· 1991-07-24· cited 47×
• In Re Carson
  S.D. Ohio· 1987-11-02· cited 30×
• In Re Magnus
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1988-04-26· cited 16×
• In Re Cramer
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1991-08-08· cited 14×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re LaBelle
  D. Maine· 1982-03-01· cited 21×
• Casarow v. Evans (In Re Evans)
  D. New Jersey· 1983-04-26· cited 18×
• In Re Lambert
  W.D. Michigan· 1981-03-12· cited 7×
• In Re Johnson
  D. New Mexico· 1984-01-11· cited 5×