· 7/21/2006
Federal Case
Citations
- 458 F.3d 92
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an adversary action which turned on the terms of a sale order was a core proceeding
- holding that an adversary 11 action which turned on the terms of a sale order was a core 12 proceeding
- describing the contours of the bankruptcy court’s inquiry regarding retaining jurisdiction after the underlying bankruptcy case has been dismissed
- keeping anti-suit injunction in place while remanding for court to make China Trade findings
- “[T]he decision whether to retain jurisdiction should be left to the sound discretion of the bankruptcy court.” (quoting In re Porges, 44 F.3d at 162)
- “Once the . . . court has addressed the propriety of imposing an anti-suit injunction . . . , [the] court must then make findings on whether it is appropriate to enter a preliminary injunction.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.