Skip to main content
· 5/1/2000

In Re Midlands Utility, Inc.

Citations

  • 251 B.R. 296
  • 44 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1010
  • 2000 Bankr. LEXIS 813
  • 2000 WL 1056337

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The Court finds that while § 1127 does not specifically provide for modification after substantial 11 See Defendants’ Combined Memorandum, p. 16 (ECF #46) (citing 11 Fed. Prac. & Proc. Civ. § 2857 (3d ed.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John E. Waites

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.