Skip to main content
D. Maryland· 1/12/2001

In Re Microsoft Corp. Antitrust Litigation

Citations

  • 127 F. Supp. 2d 702
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 305

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that C.P.L.R. 901(b) required dismissal of the plaintiffs’ class action claims without considering whether the state rule applied in federal courts
  • rejecting plaintiffs’ argument that they were equivalent to direct purchasers of defendant’s product for purposes of Illinois Brick because they entered into licensing agreements to use the product

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Motz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.