· 11/19/2003
In Re Michael T. Morrissey, Debtor, Michael T. Morrissey v. Diana A. Stuteville
Citations
- 349 F.3d 1187
- 57 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 247
- 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9926
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 23567
- 42 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 56
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that \`the selection of the sanction to be imposed must take into consideration the impact of the sanction and the alternatives available to achieve assessment of the penalties in conformity with fault'\
- stating that “ ‘the selection of the sanction to be imposed must take into consideration the impact of the sanction and the alternatives available to achieve assessment of the penalties in conformity with fault’ ”
- explaining where procedural deficiencies are numerous and egregious 26 dismissal for noncompliance is proper without an explicit consideration of alternative sanctions
- affirming 11 this Panel’s dismissal of appeal based in part on the inadequacy 12 of the appellate record
- affirming 11 this Panel’s dismissal of appeal based in part on the inadequacy 12 of the appellate record
- declining to reach the merits of the bankruptcy court’s ruling after concluding BAP’s summary affirmance was an appropriate sanction for failing to comply with briefing rules
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: O'Scannlain, Tashima, Matz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.