In Re Michael Ibenyenwa v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the Board must focus on the work of the bargaining unit employees, not on the work of other employees who may be doing the same or similar work”
• requiring the analytical focus to be on “whether an agreement seeks no more than to preserve the work of bargaining unit members” (emphasis added)
• focus of work preservation dispute is unit's traditional work, not work of other employees incidentally affected by agreement
• focus of work preservation dispute is unit’s traditional work, not work of other employees incidentally affected by agreement
• “Section 8(e) makes unlawful those collective-bargaining agreements in which the employer agrees to cease doing business with any other person.”
• court must look at \all the surrounding circumstances\ to decide if Union's objective is primary or secondary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).