Ohio Court of Appeals· 4/26/2017

In re M.I.

Citations

2017 Ohio 1524

Syllabus

JUVENILE - SEX OFFENSES - EQUAL PROTECTION: The mandatory classification of 16- and 17-year-old sex offenders under R.C. 2152.83(A) and 2152.84(A)(2)(c) does not violate the Equal Protection Clauses of the United States and Ohio Constitutions, because the juvenile-sex-offender-classification system is rationally related to the legitimate governmental interest of protecting the public from sex offenders.

Judges: Myers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

In re D.R.
Ohio Supreme Court· 2022-12-16· cited 12×
In re D.R.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-05-26· cited 11×
In re V.W.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-08-07· cited 2×
In re J.T.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-10-23
In re A.B.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2026-06-10

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Cook
Ohio Supreme Court· 1998-09-30· cited 1,648×
State v. Williams
Ohio Supreme Court· 2000-04-28· cited 556×
State v. Thompkins
Ohio Supreme Court· 1996-06-05· cited 167×
In re C.P.
Ohio Supreme Court· 2012-04-03· cited 141×
State v. Aalim (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-12-22· cited 63×
In Re D.S.
Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-16· cited 60×
State v. Thompson
Ohio Supreme Court· 2002-05-15· cited 53×
In re Forbess
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2010-06-21· cited 20×
In re M.R.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-16· cited 10×
In re T.M.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-12-27· cited 4×
In re A.W.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-08-24· cited 2×
In re R.G.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-12-27· cited 2×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.