In re M.H.
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 3776
Syllabus
CHILDREN – LEGAL CUSTODY – SUITABILITY – BEST INTEREST– R.C. 3109.04(F) – GUARDIAN AD LITEM : The juvenile court's determination that appellant mother abandoned her two children was supported by competent and credible evidence, and therefore reasonable, where testimony, including mother's own, demonstrated that mother did not visit or communicate with her daughters for months. The juvenile court's determination that awarding custody of mother's two children to their grandmother was not an abuse of discretion because the best-interest factors under R.C. 3109.04(F) were considered as part of the court's analysis, and several factors including the children's wishes, their relationships with their grandmother, and their adjustment to life with grandmother, were supported by competent and credible evidence. There was no evidence in the record to substantiate mother's claim that the guardian ad litem's report and testimony were motivated by bias where the guardian ad litem's testimony described her investigation, and she was cross-examined on the contents of her report.
Judges: Bock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
- Davis v. FlickingerOhio Supreme Court· 1997-02-12· cited 1,567×
- State v. AwanOhio Supreme Court· 1986-02-19· cited 1,385×
- In re MurrayOhio Supreme Court· 1990-07-03· cited 1,148×
- In re HayesOhio Supreme Court· 1997-06-18· cited 613×
- Perales v. NinoOhio Supreme Court· 1977-11-30· cited 446×
- Hockstok v. HockstokOhio Supreme Court· 2002-12-27· cited 210×
- Reynolds v. GollOhio Supreme Court· 1996-03-04· cited 131×
- In re C.V.M.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-11-29· cited 73×
- State ex rel. Allen Cty. Children Servs. Bd. v. Mercer Cty. Common Pleas Court, Probate Div. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-10-20· cited 49×
- In re D.M.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-06-10· cited 19×
- In re G.L.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-04-25· cited 17×
- In re H.J.H.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-01-16· cited 14×
- In re J.T.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-02-02· cited 13×
- King v. KingOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-07-15· cited 12×
- Kane v. HardinOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-10-25· cited 12×
- Baker v. RosePreble County Court of Common Pleas· 1970-11-07· cited 7×
- In re R.V.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-05-28· cited 6×
- In re C.R.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-10-05· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.