In re M.G.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Petitioner also asserts that [section] 19-1-117[, C.R.S. 2001,] violates her right to equal protection under the United States Constitution. However, that argument is raised for the first time on appeal, and we will not consider it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• in Interest of M.B
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2020-01-23· cited 712×
• In re R.A.
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2002-09-26· cited 16×
• K.A.S. v. R.E.T.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-11-30· cited 6×
• In Re Petition of RA
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2002-09-26· cited 1×
• Kas v. Ret
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-11-30
• In Re DIS
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2011-03-21
• In Re MG
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2002-09-12
• Sidman v. Sidman
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2011-03-21
• In the Matter of the Guardianship of L.Y.
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2022-01-14

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Troxel v. Granville
  Supreme Court· 2000-06-05· cited 6,943×
• Meyer v. Nebraska
  Supreme Court· 1923-06-04· cited 3,363×
• People in Interest of PD
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1978-06-01· cited 188×
• C.R.S. v. T.A.M.
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1995-01-30· cited 77×
• In Re the Adoption of T.K.J.
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1996-06-13· cited 48×
• In Re the Custody of C.M.
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2003-01-02· cited 23×
• In Matter of Petition of Jaa
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1980-09-11· cited 8×
• In Re the Marriage of Parsons
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2001-07-19· cited 8×
• People in Interest of NS
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1991-11-21· cited 5×
• People in Interest of AD
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1985-07-25· cited 3×