In re Merinda MM.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• improper emergency order extending custody in the Department of Family and Children Services was mooted by later order extending custody in the department
• any alleged error in the 5 Moreover, C. E. was not removed from his home by DFCS pursuant to the PPH. Rather, the child was removed as part of the delinquency proceedings before the dependency petition was filed. See OCGA § 15-11-504 (a) (permitting detention of alleged delinquent child

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).