Skip to main content
· 6/23/1993

In Re Mel-Hart Products, Inc.

Citations

  • 156 B.R. 606
  • 1993 Bankr. LEXIS 1060
  • 24 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 781
  • 1993 WL 287603

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “There can be no assignment from employees to [claiming company] because there was no consideration to support the purported assignment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: James G. Mixon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.