In Re Meaney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that, while motions to reopen under § 350(b) are exempt from the one-year limitation of Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9024(1) (incorporating Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• In re McKinney
  District of Columbia· 2018-08-20· cited 1×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. Partnership
  Supreme Court· 1993-03-24· cited 5,239×
• In the Matter Of: Kmart Corporation, Debtors-Appellees, Appeal Of: Wilhemina Simmons
  Seventh Circuit· 2004-08-27· cited 91×
• DeLesk v. Rhodes (In Re Rhodes)
  Ninth Circuit· 1986-05-23· cited 81×
• Michael D. Brandt, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Board of Education of City of Chicago
  Seventh Circuit· 2007-04-02· cited 51×
• In Re Keene Corp.
  S.D. New York· 1995-11-20· cited 50×
• European-American Bank v. Hill (In Re Hill)
  N.D. Georgia· 1985-04-04· cited 14×
• National Labor Relations Board v. Gratrix (In Re Gratrix)
  D. Alaska· 1984-10-11· cited 7×
• In Re Sukmungsa
  D. Utah· 2005-11-23· cited 6×
• In Re Hunter
  M.D. Florida· 2002-08-05· cited 6×
• In Re Infiltrator Systems, Inc.
  D. Connecticut· 1999-11-09· cited 6×
• Burton v. Schachter (In Re Burton)
  S.D. New York· 2004-10-15· cited 2×