In re M.D.S.
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 1761
Syllabus
The juvenile court incorrectly determined that the $9.00 court cost mandated by R.C. 2743.70(A)(2) was not waivable and abused its discretion by failing to exercise its authority to evaluate whether that cost should be waived on indigency grounds. Judgment reversed with respect to imposition of $9.00 court cost and remanded for the juvenile court to evaluate whether appellant is indigent for the purpose of determining whether it is appropriate to waive that cost. Judgment affirmed in all other respects.
Judges: Hanseman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court· 1980-05-07· cited 3,804×
- AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 1,562×
- State v. DarmondOhio Supreme Court· 2013-03-21· cited 392×
- State v. Beasley (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-01-04· cited 133×
- State v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-11-02· cited 34×
- State v. SwartzOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-10-23· cited 5×
- State v. ThomasOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-05-21· cited 1×
- In re D.L.M.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-03-21· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.