Skip to main content
· 9/17/1986

In Re Mdl 262. Ricardo Diaz Barron

Citations

  • 799 F.2d 1076
  • 5 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1404
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 30794
  • 45 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 2
  • 41 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 36,648

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that compliance with Rule 4(a)(5) is essential to appellate jurisdiction
  • “Compliance with [Rule 4(a)(5)’s] requirement[s] is essential to confer appellate jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.