Skip to main content

In re M.D.

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 3674

Syllabus

Juvenile court's conclusion, pursuant to R.C. 2151.414(D), that permanent court commitment for purposes of adoption was in the best interest of appellant's two minor children was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Even if appellant could establish standing to challenge the juvenile court's denial of maternal aunt's motion to intervene in the child custody case, juvenile court did not abuse its discretion by denying intervention. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Sadler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.