In Re McKinney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that if statutory maximum is substantially disproportionate to the value of the trustee’s services to the estate, court will award the maximum amount that is not substantially disproportionate
• court would view the statutory maximum fee as presumptively reasonable but would reduce the fee as necessary, after reviewing time records and all other relevant facts and circumstances, to ensure that the fee is “not substantially disproportionate to the value of the trustee’s services”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hopkins v. Asset Acceptance LLC (In Re Salgado-Nava)
  Ninth Circuit· 2012-07-25· cited 39×
• Mohns, Inc. v. Lanser
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2015-01-12· cited 20×
• In re Scoggins
  E.D. California· 2014-09-08· cited 15×
• In Re Coyote Ranch Contractors, LLC
  N.D. Texas· 2009-01-21· cited 12×
• In Re Ward
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 2009-09-25· cited 9×
• In Re McCombs
  S.D. Texas· 2010-08-17· cited 6×
• In Re B & B Autotransfusion Services, Inc.
  D. Idaho· 2011-01-18· cited 5×
• In Re C & D Dock Works, Inc.
  M.D. Florida· 2010-10-19· cited 2×
• In re Galdabini
  D. Idaho· 2012-06-06· cited 1×
• In re Robert Plan Corp.
  E.D. New York· 2012-08-20· cited 1×
• In re Turner Grain Merchandising, Inc.
  E.D. Arkansas· 2017-05-23· cited 1×