Skip to main content
· 6/22/2000

In Re MCI Telecommunications Corp. Complaint

Citations

  • 612 N.W.2d 826
  • 240 Mich. App. 292

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an action brought by a government agency to enforce an order issued by the agency pursuant to its regulatory authority did not require a jury trial
  • holding that an action brought by a government agency to enforce an order is-' sued by the agency pursuant to its regulatory authority did not require a jury trial
  • recognizing that the Michigan Constitution does not require adjudication by a jury where “the statutory right is so closely integrated into a public regulatory scheme as to be appropriate for resolution by an administrative agency”
  • recognizing that the Michigan Constitution does not require adjudication by a jury where \the statutory right is so closely integrated into a public regulatory scheme as to be appropriate for resolution by an administrative agency\
  • providing that “the common-law doctrine of unfair competition was ordinarily limited to acts of fraud, bad-faith misrepresentation, misappropriation, or product confusion”
  • “[T]he common-law doctrine of unfair competition was ordinarily limited to acts of fraud, bad-faith misrepresentation, misappropriation, or product confusion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hoekstra, McDonald, Meter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.