· 6/22/2000
In Re MCI Telecommunications Corp. Complaint
Citations
- 612 N.W.2d 826
- 240 Mich. App. 292
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an action brought by a government agency to enforce an order issued by the agency pursuant to its regulatory authority did not require a jury trial
- holding that an action brought by a government agency to enforce an order is-' sued by the agency pursuant to its regulatory authority did not require a jury trial
- recognizing that the Michigan Constitution does not require adjudication by a jury where “the statutory right is so closely integrated into a public regulatory scheme as to be appropriate for resolution by an administrative agency”
- recognizing that the Michigan Constitution does not require adjudication by a jury where \the statutory right is so closely integrated into a public regulatory scheme as to be appropriate for resolution by an administrative agency\
- providing that “the common-law doctrine of unfair competition was ordinarily limited to acts of fraud, bad-faith misrepresentation, misappropriation, or product confusion”
- “[T]he common-law doctrine of unfair competition was ordinarily limited to acts of fraud, bad-faith misrepresentation, misappropriation, or product confusion.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hoekstra, McDonald, Meter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.