In re McGuire & Hanlein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A subpoena issued to a non-party pursuant to Rule 45 is subject to Rule 26(b)(1)’s overriding relevance requirement.”
• “[T]he factual issue at trial will be what [defendant] knew 10 about the potential employee at the time of the alleged discrimination, not whether shortcomings surfaced at subsequent jobs.”
• employment records from other employers were not relevant to show charging party's “‘performance at other employers was deficient,’ ” as “the factual issue at trial will be what Texas Roadhouse knew ... at the time of the alleged discrimination”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).