In RE McGINNIS

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a chapter 13 plan was unconfirmable because it relied on a future change to Oregon medical marijuana law and it violated federal law
• finding if debtor proposed an amended chapter 25 13 plan that did not rely on CSA violative income streams, the court would confirm the plan
• denying confirmation because the plan’s reliance on income derived from the marijuana industry violated the good faith requirement of § 1325(a)(3)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).