In re McDowall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying state law to determine appropriate burden of proof because “[r]ules governing presumptions and burdens of proof are 22 generally regarded as substantive for purposes of Erie R. R. v. Tompkins,” 304 U.S. 64 (1938)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).